Regardless what happens in the future, it’s safe to say AI will not be an entity speaking to us in hackneyed parables, or telling us to pluck out our eyes and cut off our hands if we sin. It probably also won’t threaten us with a hopeless fiery hell of eternal punishment for our lack of faith.He knows that … how? For one thing, if an AI is sufficiently influential, whatever it says will become so well known that it will sound hackneyed.
It’s far more likely the greatest tool our species has ever created will tell us how to end world poverty with inventive technologies, how to best fix the Earth of the environmental degradation we’ve caused, and how to heal ourselves of all disease and live indefinitely via radical science.Speaking of hackneyed… It will tell us how to solve the problems that seemed most pressing back when Zoltan Istvan was doing laps in amniotic fluid?
- Isn't fixing little things like poverty or environmental “degradation” much easier than AI?
- Is there environmental degradation? Isn't the air a lot cleaner than it was in 1973?
- Hasn't absolute poverty gone way down steadily in the past generation?
- The health question may also have been solved by the time we invent AI.
- The best reason for believing in fast technical progress in AI, Moore's Law, appears to be slowing down.
Maybe Zoltan Istvan believes that technical progress in a field will be fast or slow depending on whether the speed justifies his personal prejudices.