Yet another weird SF fan


I'm a mathematician, a libertarian, and a science-fiction fan. Common sense? What's that?

Go to first entry


 

Archives

<< current
 
E-mail address:
jhertzli AT ix DOT netcom DOT com


My Earthlink/Netcom Site

My Tweets

My other blogs
Small Sample Watch
XBM Graphics


The Former Four Horsemen of the Ablogalypse:
Someone who used to be sane (formerly War)
Someone who used to be serious (formerly Plague)
Rally 'round the President (formerly Famine)
Dr. Yes (formerly Death)

Interesting weblogs:
Back Off Government!
Bad Science
Blogblivion
Boing Boing
Debunkers Discussion Forum
Deep Space Bombardment
Depleted Cranium
Dr. Boli’s Celebrated Magazine.
EconLog
Foreign Dispatches
Good Math, Bad Math
Greenie Watch
The Hand Of Munger
Howard Lovy's NanoBot
Hyscience
Liberty's Torch
The Long View
My sister's blog
Neo Warmonger
Next Big Future
Out of Step Jew
Overcoming Bias
The Passing Parade
Peter Watts Newscrawl
Physics Geek
Pictures of Math
Poor Medical Student
Prolifeguy's take
The Raving Theist
RealityCarnival
Respectful Insolence
Sedenion
Seriously Science
Shtetl-Optimized
Slate Star Codex
The Speculist
The Technoptimist
TJIC
Tools of Renewal
XBM Graphics
Zoe Brain

Other interesting web sites:
Aspies For Freedom
Crank Dot Net
Day By Day
Dihydrogen Monoxide - DHMO Homepage
Fourmilab
Jewish Pro-Life Foundation
Libertarians for Life
The Mad Revisionist
Piled Higher and Deeper
Science, Pseudoscience, and Irrationalism
Sustainability of Human Progress


























Yet another weird SF fan
 

Monday, March 18, 2013

Problems with Eugenics

Problem 1: Eugenics requires accurate genetic research. Eugenics policies will give researchers and their backers an incentive to fudge data to make their relatives look superior. For example, the eugenicists of the early 20th century fudged data in order to keep out people we can now recognize as assets.

Problem 2: In order for eugenics to work, it is not only necessary for mental abilities to be genetic, it is necessary for them to vary smoothly depending on genes. That is, if two alleles produce higher IQ, combining them must be even better. That is not necessarily the case. It's possible for the heterozygous phenotype to be superior to either homozygous phenotype.

Problem 3: There are always trade-offs. Improving long-term memory and analytic ability may come at the expense of being able to recall what color the sky is on my^H^H one's planet.

Problem 4: Why isn't everybody a genius? If evolution works faster than expected, you would expect IQs to rise until the genes get into rough territory or trade-offs start becoming important.

I was reminded by the news that the Chinese government is considering making an attempt at eugenics.

2 Comments:

Blogger Anomaly UK said...

"Why isn't everybody a genius" is a huge question. The only remotely plausible answer is that high intelligence (on an absolute scale) is maladaptive except when it is somewhat scarce. Looking around, it's not that hard to believe that could be the case.

2:23 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Breeding for intelligence" just sounds like a recipe for "breeding for Aspergers or being related to a Party boss."

But there is a potential application for eugenics: trying to eliminate physical problems. China could grant waivers to the one-child policy for people who are free of recessives for genetic diseases.

9:42 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

 
Profiles
My Blogger Profile
eXTReMe Tracker X-treme Tracker

Site Meter
The Atom Feed This page is powered by Blogger.