Watching Your Field vs. Watching a Neighboring Field

Consider this analogy: Quackwatch is to Insurance Reform Watch as teaching schoolchildren to read is to inventing the Airborne nutrition supplement.

If Insurance Reform Watch were about health-care reform, a doctor's opinion might be authoritative but it disclaims being about health-care reform. As far as insurance reform is concerned, Dr. Barrett is an interested layman with lots of anecdotes and some out-of-context research … much like an elementary schoolteacher discussing minor diseases.

Query: What if real quacks take Insurance Reform Watch to be an excuse to ignore criticism?