The Words “Mainstream,” “Consensus,” and “Heterodox”

A few years ago, I posted the following on the use of the terms “mainstream” and “consensus”:

When I try arguing against consensus thinking, I sometimes run into the objection that creationists and/or neo-nazis also object to the mainstream. It looks like the terminology used is quite different, with fascist dissidents objecting to the mainstream. and libertarian dissidents objecting to consensus. That should not be surprising. After all, the consensus is used as a way to stop thought, whereas the mainstream implies flow, so it can change.

After considering use of the term “heterodox” mentioned on EconLog, it looks like “heterodox” is commonly used by collectivist dissidents. I made up a table plotting the number of Google results from combining “consensus,” “mainstream,” or “heterodox” with terms relating to various politicized scholarly controversies:

Term	“Consensus”	“Mainstream”	“Heterodox”
fission	496,000	150,000	827
ddt	354,000	184,000	446
tobacco	1,120,000	1,130,000	44,000
creationism	381,000	572,000	9,730
holocaust	960,000	1,170,000	38,700
iq	974,000	973,000	11,600
immigration	1,320,000	1,330,000	109,000

It looks like frequent use of “heterodox” is an even better indicator that the dissidents are spouting horsebleep than the mainstream/consensus ratio.

It also looks like I should lean a little in the direction of the Establishment in the case of IQ controversies and very strongly in the direction of the Establishment in the case of immigration controversies.