Yet another weird SF fan


I'm a mathematician, a libertarian, and a science-fiction fan. Common sense? What's that?

Go to first entry


 

Archives

<< current
 
E-mail address:
jhertzli AT ix DOT netcom DOT com


My Earthlink/Netcom Site

My Tweets

My other blogs
Small Sample Watch
XBM Graphics


The Former Four Horsemen of the Ablogalypse:
Someone who used to be sane (formerly War)
Someone who used to be serious (formerly Plague)
Rally 'round the President (formerly Famine)
Dr. Yes (formerly Death)

Interesting weblogs:
Back Off Government!
Bad Science
Blogblivion
Boing Boing
Debunkers Discussion Forum
Deep Space Bombardment
Depleted Cranium
Dr. Boli’s Celebrated Magazine.
EconLog
Foreign Dispatches
Good Math, Bad Math
Greenie Watch
The Hand Of Munger
Howard Lovy's NanoBot
Hyscience
Liberty's Torch
The Long View
My sister's blog
Neo Warmonger
Next Big Future
Out of Step Jew
Overcoming Bias
The Passing Parade
Peter Watts Newscrawl
Physics Geek
Pictures of Math
Poor Medical Student
Prolifeguy's take
The Raving Theist
RealityCarnival
Respectful Insolence
Sedenion
Seriously Science
Shtetl-Optimized
Slate Star Codex
The Speculist
The Technoptimist
TJIC
Tools of Renewal
XBM Graphics
Zoe Brain

Other interesting web sites:
Aspies For Freedom
Crank Dot Net
Day By Day
Dihydrogen Monoxide - DHMO Homepage
Fourmilab
Jewish Pro-Life Foundation
Libertarians for Life
The Mad Revisionist
Piled Higher and Deeper
Science, Pseudoscience, and Irrationalism
Sustainability of Human Progress


























Yet another weird SF fan
 

Sunday, May 28, 2006

Is Natural Family Planning Necessarily Innocent?

According to a recent study (technical article here), Natural Family Planning (the “rhythm method” with minor improvements to make it actually effective), works partly by decreasing the fraction of eggs fertilized and partly by decreasing the fraction of fertilized eggs implanted. In other words, if fertilized eggs should be regarded even a little bit as human beings, that would mean Natural Family Planning increases the abortion rate.

First, we should remember that not every theory pans out. In particular, if the Roman Catholic Church is your tradition, you should not yet feel obligated to leave.

Second, if you were planning to become Catholic but the Roman Catholic Church is not your tradition, you should at least wait until this is sorted out, if ever.

Third, there are religions where Natural Family Planning is not acceptable. In particular, Orthodox Judaism holds that marital relations should not resume until after menstruation is over for a week. That will cut down on the number of nonviable embryos produced. That, of course, means that Jews who converted to the Catholic Church out of opposition to abortion should, of course, return.

An essential disclaimer for that last point: I am not an Orthodox Jew, I am Orthodox sympathetic. I agree with some of their reasons for being dubious of Reform/Conservative/Reconstructionist/Renewal Judaism. On the other hand, some parts of Orthodox Judaism seem a bit preposterous. One of the preposterous elements looks much more reasonable now. (I suppose I'll find there is a reason why kosher for Passover pet food is imperative next.)

Addendum: I suppose it's necessary to point out that enforcing a potential law against sex at the wrong time of the month really would violate privacy. Besides, by the time this research has been verified, the Catholic Church will have a different dogma.

Of course, I support the right of pharmacists to refuse to sell calendars.

3 Comments:

Blogger Francis W. Porretto said...

"First, we should remember that not every theory pans out. In particular, if the Roman Catholic Church is your tradition, you should not yet feel obligated to leave.

"Second, if you were planning to become Catholic but the Roman Catholic Church is not your tradition, you should at least wait until this is sorted out, if ever."

Joe, is it possible that someone as smart as you doesn't realize how offensive those remarks are?

8:12 AM  
Blogger Joseph said...

Maybe I've read too many of the comments from irreligious blogs with CDS (Catholic Derangement Syndrome) and eomething rubbed off.

10:38 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Is it possible not to offend RCs? Is it possible that people as smart as most RC bloggers don't realize how offensive it is to just make stuff up about Christ?

10:46 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

 
Profiles
My Blogger Profile
eXTReMe Tracker X-treme Tracker


The Atom Feed This page is powered by Blogger.