Intelligent Design and Annoying Leftists

One of the most annoying habits of some leftists is their tendency toward ad hominem arguments dressed up in fancy clothing. The Berkeley study of conservatives is probably the best-known example and the Cornell study of “challenged” masculinity is one of the most recent. It is far more respectful to consider the internal logic of someone else's theories instead of considering their personal characteristics. I recently realized that the difference between naturalistic scientific theories and theological scientific theories is that the former are based on the internal logic of the universe instead of God's personal characteristics.

The loons at Berkeley or Cornell should stick to the internal logic of the phenomena they're looking at without considering motives and the loons at the Discovery Institute should do the same. After all, do we really want some clown to start discussing whether or not God's masculinity was challenged?