Some Religions Are More Consistent Than You Might Think
On the one hand, Canadian Cynic pointed out that demand for direct observation from some creationists can be applied to police work (seen via Orac).
On the other hand, circumstantial evidence is not permitted in capital cases in Jewish religious courts. Come to think of it, Orthodox Jewish apologetics lean on the claim of direct observation of the giving of the Ten Commandments.
1 Comments:
Pity about the Jewish courts' rejection of circumstantial evidence. Often it can be more reliable than witness testimony. Fingerprints rarely lie, witnesses sometimes do.
Post a Comment
<< Home